Olivia Arigho Stiles: Freedom Press and the Anarchist Struggle

[CLICK HERE FOR THE PDF]

“Here’s your deliveries – oh and I assume you’ve heard the news, Margaret Thatcher is dead?” Interrupting a conversation at Freedom Press about police violence during the 1990 poll tax riots, the postman’s announcement possesses a certain poignancy. In a ramshackle building concealed down a gloomy Whitechapel alleyway, the anarchist collective encompasses a bookshop, a social activist centre and publishing house.

In February 2013, the collective’s shop premises were firebombed. Resigned, yet cheerily pragmatic, Andy Meinke suspects the far right. “No one this time has claimed it. That possibly shows they’ve got a great deal of sense. In our experience of these things over the years, it doesn’t tend to come from the major organisations, it tends to come from a few individuals slightly associated with them. The far right has never given up the concept of street politics or intimidating their opponents.” Its long-standing commitment to fighting the extreme right has predictably earned Freedom Press enemies of the fanatical variety. Their first firebomb attack came in 1993 and was claimed by the neo-Nazi group Combat 18 and 1999 they were subject to a serious nail-bombing.

For Freedom, the fight against fascism is tantamount to an historical crusade.Fascism been in retreat in broad historical terms but it has always been dangerous. It has always been something that needs to be combated. [Fascists are] working in a fertile environment in that the mainstream media provides them with a huge amount of help… Liberalism is the middle class when they feel secure, and fascism is the middle class when they’re afraid.”

It would seem broadly true that the ongoing economic crisis is creating a propitious context for neo-fascism across Britain and Europe, manifesting in the rise of extremist far-right party Golden Dawn in Greece, the neo-Nazi party Jobbik (currently the third largest in Hungary), and the recent celebration of a fascist era statue in Brescia, Italy. Yet in a 1944 article, George Orwell famously posed the question ‘What is Fascism?’ and concluded that the term ‘is almost entirely meaningless’. Meinke disagrees.”[The term] peels away the disguises of every time they say ‘we’re not fascists but…’ It is something that people understand and it [is] inextricably [linked] with the excesses that we know the far-right is responsible for. Propaganda terms are useful because they convey ideas.”

With around eighty books in print, Freedom press has mostly recently published the book Beating the Fascists: the Untold Story of Anti-Fascist Action (2010), a collaborative book written by a cross section of anti-fascist activists, published under the name of Sean Birchall. The book offers an immensely powerful history of the militant anti-fascist movement from the late 1970s to the late 1990s. It is a bleak indictment of the mainstream media and the political authorities’ often inconsistent attitude towards fascist street violence. It’s not from a particularly anarchist viewpoint, it’s more from the view of Anti-Fascist Action, which was a coalition of socialist and anarchists and some others. We wouldn’t actually politically agree with all the analysis, but we think it’s an extremely valuable history of something most mainstream publishers wouldn’t touch for the potential of being sued. We’re not worried about being sued – for one thing we’ve got no money, and the history of people trying to sue anarchists, if you look at things like the McLibel trial(1), it tends to generate us a great deal more publicity than it does us harm.”

But Freedom are under no illusions that that an anarchist revolution is either inevitable or imminent. Meinke’s outlook is steadfastly rooted in the practical: “One of the dynamics of revolutionary change is that you need someone on the extreme revolutionary side to move the cogs up the wheel, to shift the balance of mainstream thought.” Whilst committed to publishing traditional anarchist literature from Peter Kropotkin, Errico Malatesta and Charlotte Wilson et al., Freedom are breezily candid about the dangers of appearing anachronistic in a contemporary political context. “We are not living in the 19th century and anarchists have to come to terms with the fact that after you got universal suffrage, continuing to act as if you’re run by despots does make you look silly. But that doesn’t mean you can’t point out the flaws in the current system [and] a democratic set-up which is designed to make change as difficult as possible. As the Franco-Prussian war spawns the commune, and the Russian revolution spawns Soviets, the model for setting up genuinely democratic forms of society is to be found as people experience and change. The past ones seem to be no longer totally applicable because your community has changed from being where you live and the workplace you’re in, to a vast amount of social networks available to people online. People’s friendship groups are scattered geographically and people’s ways of organising are transformed. We already see some interesting things; it happened with the SWP attempting to get people not to talk about things online utterly backfiring. But we see it with the judiciary trying to clamp down on social media because they can’t really get their heads around the idea that this is the way ideas are going to be communicated.”

Meinke has witnessed several decades of protest. He gestures to a large photo tacked to the wall showing a young woman confronting a police officer on a poll tax protest. Like all iconic photos, it seems impersonal to the outside observer, despite its patent visual power. “Lorraine Vivien. She got a year in prison for that. Her mum shopped her.” But with the recent student occupation over privatisation at Sussex University, Meinke is optimistic about the prospects of student militancy. “I’d been really scared over post-Millbank [2010] … that student activism had collapsed and curtailed. It was really nice to go to Brighton(2) which is very difficult to get to, particularly as an out-of-town campus.”

Yet with the Coalition’s increasingly brutal programme of austerity, one might wonder whether Freedom feel any sense of frustration with the wider left in the drive to foster popular resistance. Recognising the historical divisions between anarchists and Marxists (expelled from the First International’s Congress in 1872, an anarchist wing set up a counter-congress at a cafe over the road in Geneva)(3), it is perhaps unsurprising that Freedom does not consider itself wholly integrated with the left as a whole. “For the last four years, the left has been desperately looking for how we understand the economic crisis and how we respond to it. Anarchism is part of the left but there have been tendencies in the past for anarchists to be very inward-looking. I think that’s less true now and at the same time, a large part of the traditional British Trotskyist left have been looking at new models of organisation that have come out of Reclaim The Streets [and] Occupy. A lot of the issues that are coming up, like the recent crisis in the SWP,(4) affect everyone across the left.” Meinke accepts that the anarchist wing should not be exempt from criticism.” We shouldn’t gloat, because it’s something I’ve seen happen the anarchist movement and dealt with really badly – maybe not in the same sort of ways, but with organisational inertia, very few people being willing to challenge hierarchies. [I realise] that a huge amount of people in the left just haven’t taken sexual violence seriously for a long time. That will need to be re-examined in a major way.”

First published in 1886 and edited by Charlotte Wilson and Peter Kropotkin, Freedom magazine was originally ‘for socialist anarchism’, although the ‘socialist’ tag was subsequently dropped. The current ambitions of the newspaper remain modest. Moving towards making all their books available electronically, Freedom are simply aiming to maintain the paper, whether in print form or electronically. “We had a structural engineer who came round and said ‘[the building is] safe for five years, possibly even ten!’. At some point we will want to move out of here, somewhere on a street front to get more passing trade.”

Whitechapel, where the bookshop has been located since 1969, has a long history of accommodating political subversives. Fuelled by increased political and anti-Semitic violence in Russia following the assassination of Tsar Alexander II in 1881, the East End saw a vast wave of Jewish, socialist and anarchist immigration. Across the road from the Freedom Press building is Altab Ali park, named after a Bangladeshi man killed by fascists in the 1970s. Nearby, Cable Street witnessed the famed 1936 confrontation between Oswald Mosleys Blackshirts, the police and a broad section of anti-fascist protestors. Meinke is despondent about recent changes taking place across London. “We are seeing a virtual clear-out of certain areas, as the council is paying people to live outside London. We’ve spent years talking about a yuppification but this is a social purge of frightening proportions. The austerity programme has been delayed and is now coming big-time.”

Shadowed by the hyper-gentrified Spitalfields and the headquarters of banking giant RBS, Freedom coexists uneasily with the symbols of the system it has resolved to change. The building provides office and meeting space for small, local resistance groups such as Corporate Watch, the Advisory Service for Squatters and the London Coalition against Poverty. “[In the last ten years, activism is] increasingly a much more important part of our work. It’s a shift in the anarchist movement itself and a shift in the people attracted to Freedom. Until 2002, it was virtually owned by someone who was of a rather liberal bent and that has shifted. We like to think were involved with ongoing struggles, and anti-fascism is one of those.”

It was Kropotkin who noted, “it is often said that Anarchists live in a world of dreams to come, and do not see the things which happen today. We do see them only too well, and in their true colours, and that is what makes us carry the hatchet into the forest of prejudice that besets us”.(5) Wary of hierarchical organisations, Freedom Press remain committed to the grass roots struggle for social transformation which roots them in the east London community. Buoyed by international struggles yet steadfastly pragmatic about the slow realities of change, its ideology and approach retains a kind of practical beauty, premised on human beneficence, challenging hatred, and the vast power of collective, horizontal organisation. •

Olivia Arigho Stiles is a second year history student at Somerville College, Oxford.

→ next article

1   A lengthy court case from 1986 to 1997 in which two environmental campaigners were sued by McDonalds after accusing the corporation of environmental abuses. The court case resulted in a dubious victory for McDonalds after they were awarded £60,000 damages but their legal costs ran into the millions, the defendants lacked the funds to pay it, and the company suffered sustained negative publicity.

2   Brighton is the site of an ongoing student protest against the outsourcing of 235 Sussex University campus jobs.

3   Paul B. Smith, ‘Bakunin’s Expulsion from the First International’

4   A senior party member accused of rape was crudely ‘tried’ by a jury of his friends and colleagues through an internal disputes committee and wider dissent was penalised.

5   Peter Kropotkin, Anarchism: Its Philosophy and Ideal (1901)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s